Ship Faster. With Governance. And Proof for Every Audit.

Your board wants velocity. Your auditors want evidence. Your developers want to ship without fighting the pipeline. Policy-as-code lets you have all three: governance rules that are version-controlled, testable, and automated—accelerating releases instead of blocking them. This isn't compliance theater. It's engineering excellence that happens to satisfy auditors.

RISKflo: 1,100+ active daily users at HSBC. 99%+ uptime over 24+ months. Event-sourced architecture with 100% submission correlation accuracy.

What's Breaking

Inconsistent pipelines

Different tools per team. Fragile deployments. 'Works on my machine' at infrastructure scale.

Audit friction

Can't prove what was deployed, when, by whom. Evidence assembly is manual and painful.

Fragile deployments

High rollback rates. Production incidents that take days to diagnose. Change fear.

Knowledge silos

'Hero' dependency. Only two people understand the deployment process. Bus factor = 1.

Governance as obstacle

Approval gates that block velocity. Compliance requirements that slow everything down.

What You Need

Governed CI/CD

Versioned rules, environment protections, reusable workflows. Consistency without rigidity.

Automatic audit trails

Every action, every approval, every deployment—permanently recorded and instantly queryable.

Faster, safer releases

Deploy 2-5x more frequently with <5% change failure rate. Confidence, not fear.

Developer experience

Self-service that works. Documentation that's accurate. Onboarding that doesn't take months.

Governance as accelerator

Policy-as-code that helps developers ship with confidence, not gates that block them.

RISKflo: Enterprise GRC at 1,100+ Users, 99%+ Uptime, 47-73% Cost Advantage

RISKflo

HSBC needed an enterprise GRC platform to replace legacy systems and compete with ServiceNow and Archer. We built RISKflo on event-sourcing architecture—every action permanently recorded, every approval instantly queryable, every deployment automatically traced. The result: 24+ months of continuous operation at 99%+ uptime, serving 1,100+ daily users. Support cases per user per year: 0.017—that's 30x better than industry average. Infrastructure cost: 27-53% of industry standard ($100-200/user/year). Event sourcing isn't just an architecture pattern. It's the foundation for audit trails that satisfy regulators without manual evidence assembly.

1,100+ active daily users HSBC APAC region
99%+ uptime 24+ months continuous
99% submission correlation Event sourcing accuracy
47-73% cost advantage vs. ServiceNow/Archer
Read Full Case Study

Governed SDLC: The Platform Engineering Approach

GitHub Enterprise governance, policy-as-code, and CI/CD standards—designed by engineers who've shipped enterprise platforms.

Typical DORA Metric Improvements

2-5x Deployment frequency
50-70% Lead time reduction
<5% Change failure rate
40-60% MTTR reduction

Results vary based on starting maturity, team size, and organizational context. These ranges reflect outcomes across our platform engineering client portfolio.

Enterprise Platform Engineering Without Enterprise Overhead

You need production-ready platforms that satisfy audit requirements and regulatory constraints. Big 4 delivers 18-month discovery phases. Agencies deliver prototypes. We deliver governed SDLC infrastructure that ships code and generates compliance evidence.

Principal-led delivery

Every engagement led by Gregory McKenzie (Systems Architect + Patent Attorney). No junior developers learning Terraform on your infrastructure.

3-6 months to production

Not 18-36 months of architecture documents. We ship working CI/CD pipelines, policy automation, and audit trails—not recommendations.

Compliance-native architecture

Event sourcing, audit logging, policy-as-code built in from day one. Your auditors get evidence exports, not manual attestations.

Law-to-code methodology

Regulatory requirements become executable controls with automated evidence capture. This is what happens when your architect is also a patent attorney.

Timeline: 3-6 months
Investment: $100K-$200K AUD
Includes implementation, documentation, training, and 30-day post-delivery support. Compared to $500K-$3M for equivalent Big 4 scope—delivered in half the time.

Questions

Common Questions from Platform Leaders

We have internal platform team. Why external help?

Your team knows your systems. We bring specialized expertise in governance patterns, policy-as-code, and audit architectures that most platform teams don't encounter regularly. We work alongside your team, do knowledge transfer, and leave you with capabilities—not dependencies. Think of it as accelerated capability building.

Will this slow us down? Governance usually does.

That's because most governance is implemented wrong—manual gates, approval bottlenecks, policies in wikis. Policy-as-code is different: rules are automated, testable, and part of the pipeline. Our clients deploy 2-5x more frequently AFTER implementing governance. Speed and safety aren't trade-offs when governance is engineered correctly.

How do you handle our existing tooling?

We're platform agnostic. GitHub Enterprise is our most common context, but we work with whatever you have. The patterns are transferable—policy-as-code, audit trails, automated gates. We adapt to your stack, not the other way around.

Ready to Ship Faster—With Proof for Every Audit?

15-minute discovery call. We'll discuss your current deployment process, governance requirements, and what realistic DORA improvements look like for your context. No sales pitch. Just engineering conversation.